The Lone Fortress
*** Defending Truth from Conventional Wisdom ***


Saturday, October 09, 2004
 
Barone on Duelfer
Michael Barone cuts through the Duelfer report spin and makes the case that, even with the benefit of Kerry's hindsight, Bush was right to go to war. And probably would have been negligent not to.
"U.S. 'Almost All Wrong' on Weapons" read the headline on the October 7 Washington Post. "Report on Iraq Contradicts Bush Administration Claims" read the subhead. But these headlines conceal the real news in the report of Iraq Survey Group head Charles Duelfer. For the report makes it plain that George W. Bush had good reason to go to war in Iraq and end the regime of Saddam Hussein....

[W]e were facing a brutal dictator with the capability to develop WMDs and the proven willingness to use them. A dictator whose regime had had, as the 9/11 Commission has documented, frequent contacts with al Qaeda. We have no conclusive evidence that he collaborated with al Qaeda on 9/11—but also no conclusive evidence that he did not. Under those circumstances, George W. Bush acted prudently in deciding to remove this regime. He would have been imprudent not to have done so.

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home


Powered by Blogger